There's been a run of comments in the past few days. Julie wrote...
My heart bleeds for us.
And Shu wrote...
I would be SO angry if I weren't so exhausted. Where are the answers?
And responding to an older post, Roberta wrote...
I'm the only child, on my own, and I am about to explode with caregiver rage. I've been watching her deterioration due to vascular dementia for almost 3 years now. An Alzheimer's's counselor told me that there will come a point where she'll be docile, but on the other hand I hear about someone's dad who got kicked out of two assisted living places for being so ornery.
Why does it feel like we're all going through this alone?
Short answer - it feels like we're going through it alone because we're going through it alone. Look - I hope this blog gives all of you some comfort, and I know I get some comfort from your comments and your own blogs and the discussions over on the Alzheimer's Association forum. But at the end of the day we go back to our (solitary) caregiving lives because that's where the (lack of a) system leaves us.
You'd like to see it fixed but there's so much wrong here and it cuts so deep that it's hard to know where a fix would begin. Better resources for caregivers would be a start. That would require higher budgets and better pay scales in professional caregiving organizations. Those would require funding. And funding would require that somebody out there thought this was a problem worth solving at a higher level.
Nobody thinks that because, to be completely blunt, there's no money in it. You know, a few weeks ago I was getting all complex and exotic (a bad habit of mine) about the idea that society can't see Alzheimer's because it can't see vacuums and empty spaces. All very nice as far as it goes but the truth is simpler. Nobody can see Alzheimer's - or for that matter any other chronic illness - because treating them doesn't generate any revenue. A disease that requires drug intervention or surgery means that there's money changing hands. Pharmaceutical companies and device makers and surgeons all get compensated. When money changes hands, attention must be paid.
In the case of a chronic illness, there's no financial exchange to speak of. What does home care consist of? Mostly lower-paid labor - at most, nurses, but more usually, aides, attendants, physical therapists, housekeepers and such. Surgery and drugs can't do much good. So the whole problem sinks out of sight. In the case of Alzheimer's its worse, because Alzheimer's is mostly a disease of old age. And since old people aren't "productive" anymore (meaning they don't go to a workplace and make things that generate revenue), they're out of sight, too. The end result is that all of us are left scrambling or staggering or what have you to try to keep ourselves sane and pull the care package together. Either we're riding herd on underpaid, incompetent, demoralized staff, or we don't even have the resources for that and we're doing it ourselves with no background and no training.
A few years ago in another life, I got to attend a senior management meeting of a major global corporation. You'd recognize the name. Dozens of genuinely bright, motivated people spent days in meetings discussing strategies for making and marketing potato chips. I remember thinking at the time how amazing and somewhat bizarre it was that all that talent was concentrated and focused on potato chip distribution. Back then, I was sympathetic to free-market sensibilities and I told myself that this was all OK - potato chips make people happy and capital flows follow happiness and attract talent. And in fact the challenges of the potato chip business are extremely complex and involving, and - I mean this without irony - require brainpower and talent to solve.
Now I look back and think about it differently. I think that the potato chip meeting was a sign of how profoundly wrong things are. Put another way - in a just society with better values, all that brainpower and talent would come together around a problem like Alzheimer's, or chronic disease, or home care. But for that to happen, we'd have to change all our assumptions and values. At the most basic level, we'd have to conclude that people are valuable in themselves, rather than in terms of their productivity and earning power, and we'd have to be willing to allocate resources to care for them on that basis, rather than letting them (and their families) slide into oblivion because they sit outside the capital flows.
I wish I could see some sign of that happening. But I don't. Not even the Obama administration has the political capital to change the way society is wired at the level it needs to be changed. As with much else in the U.S., we're going to have to wait for this to become a fully developed catastrophe - half the population with Alzheimer's and half the society acting as caregivers and pulled out of the economic mainstream - before anybody does what needs to be done.
Some days I get the sense that that could actually happen, because it feels like the catastrophe is coming along nicely, thanks.
Recent Comments